Sunday, June 3, 2012

Defense of Marriage Act - #3938 - A First: Appeals Court Strikes Down Defense of Marriage Act - Baptist Press (2) Why No State, Including Colorado, Should Accept Civil Unions - Townhall (3) Black Pastors Group Demands Meeting With Obama Over Gay Marriage - Washington Times

A federal appeals court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in a unanimous ruling Thursday (May 31), becoming the first appeals court ever to rule against the federal law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The three-judge panel of the First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston affirmed a lower court's ruling that DOMA is unconstitutional because it denies federal benefits to same-sex couples in states where they can legally marry. The ruling, which will be appealed, would force the United States to recognize same-sex marriages from the seven states and the District of Columbia where it is legal, and by extension grant federal benefits, such as tax breaks and federal employee spousal insurance, to same-sex couples. DOMA was passed in 1996 by a bipartisan 84 percent of those in Congress and signed by President Clinton. The appeals court ruling did not overrule another major section of DOMA that gives states latitude in defining marriage. That section was not challenged. The ruling struck down Section 3 of the act, the part defining marriage for federal purposes.  Read more.........

Why No State, Including Should Accept Civil Unions - Townhall - Note: This testimony was provided to the Colorado House Judiciary Committee on May 3, 2012 concerning Colorado S.B. 002, a proposed “civil unions” bill. Well-meaning folks, including legislators, who oppose redefining marriage, yet support civil unions and domestic partnerships for same-sex couples, do so with the mistaken belief that both sides of the marriage debate will be satisfied with this apparent compromise. In practice, however, neither side is happy. And more importantly, as a legal matter, civil union laws absolutely undermine the case for marriage. Make no mistake about it; a vote for this bill is a vote for same-sex “marriage.” In every U.S. jurisdiction where civil unions or domestic partnerships have been enacted, those who advocated for their passage subsequently rejected them as inadequate and demanded that marriage be redefined.  Read more..........


Related Article:  Direct Link
*Black Pastors Groups Demands Meeting with Obama Over Gay Marriage - Washington Times..

No comments:

Post a Comment